Post reply
Original Message:
Nope......NOT AT ALL like EITHER a dog OR a car... (by KC):
ian139 wrote:I am saying / said no such thing. I could not possibly state the straightforward legal FACTS and details of the permanency of timeshare ownership and its associated legal obligations any more precisely or more clearly than I have already done, in comprehensive detail, in my November 22 post (see above) on this particular matter.So, youre saying a timeshare is more like a dog than a car: While you own a car, you pay to maintain it, license it, etc. But, if you want to be rid of it, you sell it, or if it has no value, you give it away or let it be towed away. With a dog, you feed it, care for it, and if you no longer want to own it, you must find someone who will agree to feed it and care for it, cant simply let it go. Im still trying to figure out the right way to think about this.
It's the underlying, governing condominium documents, clearly referenced within your (and every other) timeshare deed, which rule all. It seems as though you choose to simply ignore the existence and / or irrefutable legal or contractual meaning or application of these governing documents, but your personal "denial" does not in any way alter (or diminish) the indisputable contractual and legal obligations or facts associated therewith. Period, amen.
There is nothing further I could (...or will) contribute to this discussion. The legal facts are the legal facts, whether or not you happen to personally acknowledge, like or accept them.
I bear you no ill will; this discussion has hopefully provided some legal information and insight to (...other) readers here. I wish you luck in whatever (lawful) course of action you choose to pursue.