Post reply

Owners meeting update (by Chris V.):

hello elainef88,

it is i who has 2 SEPARATE AND DISTINCT CONTRACTS: one paid in full (maintenance and taxes), the other with taxes but not maintenance paid: denied admittance to the aug 4 meeting, because i was "in arrears of my financial obligations." the fact is obvious: the eichner clan wanted as few owners as possible at the meeting......and the actual illegality of not allowing questions is totally absurd and must be addressed by a responsible timeshare regulatory agency (probably currently non-existent) concerning the board meetings of timeshares (the same as condominiums.) as i have urged in the past, the entire timeshare industry in the united states must be brought to task by the federal government and a national timeshare regulatory agency must be created to prevent/curtail current fraud, scamming and illegal financial and other activities perpetrated by the timeshare principals.....eg, eichner and cronies.

keep in touch,

stay well, but angry ( our current mc timeshare ownership dilemma.)

chrisv126

elainef88 wrote:

Shouldn't the AG be made aware of how owners were turned away from the Aug 4 meeting. I recall hearing of one owner who had 2 contracts for 2 separate weeks. He was paid up on one but still denied a ticket to attend. NAND the fact that no questions were allowed is reprehensible ... Why hold this meeting at all?